I couldn't be happier... It's warm enough to wear a tank, sunny enough to smile, and balmy enough to feel your hair move on your shoulders.
Jeanette Winterson's new novel Lighthousekeeping is sublime.
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
Tuesday, May 11, 2004
Essays
On several occasions back home, when people discovered I live in Paris, they would say, "Oh, what a wonderful place to write about!" And I would smile and play along, secretly wondering if I would ever write about Paris. It had never occurred to me during the first three years here to set any of my stories in Paris, or to directly write about my experiences here. Why?
After Nina Simone, another great discovery: Montaigne. I like the personal nature and form of his essays, his expert knowledge of history and its anecdotes, and, most of all, the absence of firm conclusion. He doesn't show you the right path (of truth, beauty, whatever) but an entire landscape. He points out the different terrains, gives you some bearings, then finally leaves you to weave your way however you like. Granted, I'm still in the first book of the Essais; perhaps this openness is merely the openness of beginnings.
Anyway, back to not having written about Paris. In his essay on sadness, Montaigne recounts the story of an Egyptian king who is defeated by the Persians and must watch his daughter humiliated in servants' clothes and his son led to his death. He doesn't show any emotion. It is only when he sees one of his old servants among the captives that he weeps. The Persian king asks why he cried for his servant and not for his own children. And he replies, "It is because only the last displeasure could be expressed by tears, the first two being far beyond expression." Later in the essay, it turns out that great joy too might lie beyond words and expression. Montaigne sums up the Greek philosopher Seneca by saying, "All passions that can be tasted and digested are mediocre."
I really did fall in love with Paris about six months after moving here. The first spring here struck me completely dumb. After such a long and difficult winter, long days of soft sunshine and , alternately, field- and sea-scented breezes made me giddy. For the first time, I could understand where the cliche of spring signifying rebirth and miracles came from. But I never wrote about all that beauty until recently. Perhaps it's the fact that I'm leaving that makes me willing to accept a less-than-perfect representation of what I love about Paris; I don't trust my memory, and a mediocre approximation is better than nothing. Maybe it's like watching a storm of beautiful birds swoop and flash their crazy colors above your head--you don't think, you revel. It's only afterwards, when the birds are gone, that you begin to tell yourself what you just saw.
After Nina Simone, another great discovery: Montaigne. I like the personal nature and form of his essays, his expert knowledge of history and its anecdotes, and, most of all, the absence of firm conclusion. He doesn't show you the right path (of truth, beauty, whatever) but an entire landscape. He points out the different terrains, gives you some bearings, then finally leaves you to weave your way however you like. Granted, I'm still in the first book of the Essais; perhaps this openness is merely the openness of beginnings.
Anyway, back to not having written about Paris. In his essay on sadness, Montaigne recounts the story of an Egyptian king who is defeated by the Persians and must watch his daughter humiliated in servants' clothes and his son led to his death. He doesn't show any emotion. It is only when he sees one of his old servants among the captives that he weeps. The Persian king asks why he cried for his servant and not for his own children. And he replies, "It is because only the last displeasure could be expressed by tears, the first two being far beyond expression." Later in the essay, it turns out that great joy too might lie beyond words and expression. Montaigne sums up the Greek philosopher Seneca by saying, "All passions that can be tasted and digested are mediocre."
I really did fall in love with Paris about six months after moving here. The first spring here struck me completely dumb. After such a long and difficult winter, long days of soft sunshine and , alternately, field- and sea-scented breezes made me giddy. For the first time, I could understand where the cliche of spring signifying rebirth and miracles came from. But I never wrote about all that beauty until recently. Perhaps it's the fact that I'm leaving that makes me willing to accept a less-than-perfect representation of what I love about Paris; I don't trust my memory, and a mediocre approximation is better than nothing. Maybe it's like watching a storm of beautiful birds swoop and flash their crazy colors above your head--you don't think, you revel. It's only afterwards, when the birds are gone, that you begin to tell yourself what you just saw.
Wednesday, May 05, 2004
Paris and Nina
Two months left to live in a privileged, dreamlike world of long walks, tall drinks, good company, and an unbeatable space to write in: Paris. It's spring showering outside today, and the trees are heavy with sodden pollen. I've just become friends with my downstairs neighbor, who is a Spanish anthropology student from Zaragoza. It is the first time I've even known the name of any neighbor, much less socialized with him, in years. It's a nice change, even if it means that I sometimes get an unexpected knock on my door and have to scurry for a pair of jeans. I've relished total anonymity a little too long, maybe.
I'm moving back to the States this summer, which fills me with trepidation, comfort, and, occasionally, panic. The hard part of having lived abroad for four years is that 'abroad' has become home; departures and homecomings are all mixed up and constantly evolving. I think I don't want to go back. I want to either stay where I am now or move forward somewhere new. I should stop thinking so linearly, e.g. I've already lived in NY, so if I go back there, I am not moving forward. Bull. Because it isn't so much the place as your spirit which determines whether it is new. I've learned that. Unfortunately, I've learned it by moving around, and the fact is that I want to keep learning things this way.
I've just discovered Nina Simone. A friend yelled, "I can't believe you've gone this long in life without knowing her!" Well, I guess one nice thing about not knowing everything already is the immense, novel, childlike pleasure when you *do* finally get with it. 'Do I Move You?' [yeahhh...!]
I'm moving back to the States this summer, which fills me with trepidation, comfort, and, occasionally, panic. The hard part of having lived abroad for four years is that 'abroad' has become home; departures and homecomings are all mixed up and constantly evolving. I think I don't want to go back. I want to either stay where I am now or move forward somewhere new. I should stop thinking so linearly, e.g. I've already lived in NY, so if I go back there, I am not moving forward. Bull. Because it isn't so much the place as your spirit which determines whether it is new. I've learned that. Unfortunately, I've learned it by moving around, and the fact is that I want to keep learning things this way.
I've just discovered Nina Simone. A friend yelled, "I can't believe you've gone this long in life without knowing her!" Well, I guess one nice thing about not knowing everything already is the immense, novel, childlike pleasure when you *do* finally get with it. 'Do I Move You?' [yeahhh...!]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)